
DESIGN OF AN AIRFOIL FOR
A HIGH-ALTITUDE, LONG-ENDURANCE REMOTELY PILOTED VEHICLE
http://www.rollinghillsresearch.com/Aero_Research/Files/AIAA-2003-0211_NLFairfoil.pdf
NLF1015 coordinates
NLF1015 picture
More accurate picture of NLF1015
The blade angle range for constant-speed propellers varies from about 11 1/2 to 40°. The higher the speed of the airplane, the greater the blade angle range.
The range of possible blade angles is termed the propeller's governing range. The governing range is defined by the limits of the propeller blade's travel between high and low blade angle pitch stops. As long as the propeller blade angle is within the governing range and not against either pitch stop, a constant engine r.p.m. will be maintained. However, once the propeller blade reaches its pitch-stop limit, the engine r.p.m. will increase or decrease with changes in airspeed and propeller load similar to a fixed-pitch propeller. For example, once a specific r.p.m. is selected, if the airspeed decreases enough, the propeller blades will reduce pitch, in an attempt to maintain the selected r.p.m., until they contact their low pitch stops. From that point, any further reduction in airspeed will cause the engine r.p.m. to decrease. Conversely, if the airspeed increases, the propeller blade angle will increase until the high pitch stop is reached. The engine r.p.m. will then begin to increase.
The engine is started with the propeller control in the low pitch/high r.p.m. position. This position reduces the load or drag of the propeller and the result is easier starting and warm-up of the engine. During warm-up, the propeller blade changing mechanism should be operated slowly and smoothly through a full cycle. This is done by moving the propeller control (with the manifold pressure set to produce about 1,600 r.p.m.) to the high pitch/low r.p.m. position, allowing the r.p.m. to stabilize, and then moving the propeller control back to the low pitch takeoff position. This should be done for two reasons: to determine whether the system is operating correctly, and to circulate fresh warm oil through the propeller governor system. It should be remembered that the oil has been trapped in the propeller cylinder since the last time the engine was shut down. There is a certain amount of leakage from the propeller cylinder, and the oil tends to congeal, especially if the outside air temperature is low. Consequently, if the propeller isn't exercised before takeoff, there is a possibility that the engine may overspeed on takeoff.
An airplane equipped with a constant-speed propeller has better takeoff performance than a similarly powered airplane equipped with a fixed-pitch propeller. This is because with a constant-speed propeller, an airplane can develop its maximum rated horsepower (red line on the tachometer) while motionless. An airplane with a fixed- pitch propeller, on the other hand, must accelerate down the runway to increase airspeed and aerodynamically unload the propeller so that r.p.m. and horsepower can steadily build up to their maximum. With a constant- speed propeller, the tachometer reading should come up to within 40 r.p.m. of the red line as soon as full power is applied, and should remain there for the entire takeoff.
Excessive manifold pressure raises the cylinder compression pressure, resulting in high stresses within the engine. Excessive pressure also produces high engine temperatures. A combination of high manifold pressure and low r.p.m. can induce damaging detonation. In order to avoid these situations, the following sequence should be followed when making power changes.
It is a fallacy that (in non-turbocharged engines) the manifold pressure in inches of mercury (inches Hg) should never exceed r.p.m. in hundreds for cruise power settings. The cruise power charts in the AFM/POH should be consulted when selecting cruise power settings. Whatever the combinations of r.p.m. and manifold pressure listed in these charts—they have been flight tested and approved by the airframe and powerplant engineers for the respective airframe and engine manufacturer. Therefore, if there are power settings such as 2,100 r.p.m. and 24 inches manifold pressure in the power chart, they are approved for use.
With a constant-speed propeller, a power descent can be made without overspeeding the engine. The system compensates for the increased airspeed of the descent by increasing the propeller blade angles. If the descent is too rapid, or is being made from a high altitude, the maximum blade angle limit of the blades is not sufficient to hold the r.p.m. constant. When this occurs, the r.p.m. is responsive to any change in throttle setting.
Some pilots consider it advisable to set the propeller control for maximum r.p.m. during the approach to have full horsepower available in case of emergency. If the governor is set for this higher r.p.m. early in the approach when the blades have not yet reached their minimum angle stops, the r.p.m. may increase to unsafe limits. However, if the propeller control is not readjusted for the takeoff r.p.m. until the approach is almost completed, the blades will be against, or very near their minimum angle stops and there will be little if any change in r.p.m. In case of emergency, both throttle and propeller controls should be moved to takeoff positions.
Many pilots prefer to feel the airplane respond immediately when they give short bursts of the throttle during approach. By making the approach under a little power and having the propeller control set at or near cruising r.p.m., this result can be obtained.
Although the governor responds quickly to any change in throttle setting, a sudden and large increase in the throttle setting will cause a momentary overspeeding of the engine until the blades become adjusted to absorb the increased power. If an emergency demanding full power should arise during approach, the sudden advancing of the throttle will cause momentary overspeeding of the engine beyond the r.p.m. for which the governor is adjusted. This temporary increase in engine speed acts as an emergency power reserve.
Some important points to remember concerning constant-speed propeller operation are:
Croatia Airlines management stated that they are surprised and annoyed that these sorts of rumours have been released to the public although they did remind that both Adria and Croatia Airlines are Star Alliance members. The airline says it will lease an aircraft from the company that offers the least expensive plane. The airline also states that both Dash8s will be in the Croatia Airlines fleet this year although the delivery of the aircraft has been slightly delayed. Croatia Airlines already has 2 of the four 76-seat aircraft it has order.
On some constant-speed propellers, changes in pitch are obtained by the use of an inherent centrifugal twisting moment of the blades that tends to flatten the blades toward low pitch, and oil pressure applied to a hydraulic piston connected to the propeller blades which moves them toward high pitch. Another type of constant-speed propeller uses counterweights attached to the blade shanks in the hub. Governor oil pressure and the blade twisting moment move the blades toward the low pitch position, and centrifugal force acting on the counterweights moves them (and the blades) toward the high pitch position. In the first case above, governor oil pressure moves the blades towards high pitch, and in the second case, governor oil pressure and the blade twisting moment move the blades toward low pitch. A loss of governor oil pressure, therefore, will affect each differently.
The turbocharged engine allows the pilot to maintain sufficient cruise power at high altitudes where there is less drag, which means faster true airspeeds and increased range with fuel economy. At the same time, the powerplant has flexibility and can be flown at a low altitude without the increased fuel consumption of a turbine engine. When attached to the standard powerplant, the turbocharger does not take any horsepower from the powerplant to operate; it is relatively simple mechanically, and some models can pressurize the cabin as well.
The turbine has the capability of producing manifold pressure in excess of the maximum allowable for the particular engine. In order not to exceed the maximum allowable manifold pressure, a bypass or waste gate is used so that some of the exhaust will be diverted overboard before it passes through the turbine.
The position of the waste gate regulates the output of the turbine and therefore, the compressed air available to the engine. When the waste gate is closed, all of the exhaust gases pass through and drive the turbine. As the waste gate opens, some of the exhaust gases are routed around the turbine, through the exhaust bypass and overboard through the exhaust pipe.
The waste gate actuator is a spring-loaded piston, operated by engine oil pressure. The actuator, which adjusts the waste gate position, is connected to the waste gate by a mechanical linkage.
The control center of the turbocharger system is the pressure controller. This device simplifies turbocharging to one control: the throttle. Once the pilot has set the desired manifold pressure, virtually no throttle adjustment is required with changes in altitude. The controller senses compressor discharge requirements for various altitudes and controls the oil pressure to the waste gate actuator which adjusts the waste gate accordingly. Thus the turbocharger maintains only the manifold pressure called for by the throttle setting.
Jat Airways immediately began work on securing a new connection to Australia and it seems to have found a new partner. It is Emirates’ arch rival Etihad Airways, the national carrier of the United Arab Emirates. The new deal will allow Serbs to travel to and from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane via Abu Dhabi to Belgrade, although the airline is rapidly expanding and planning to begin services to Perth. Meetings have taken place between the two carriers in Sydney and in the first week of February will take place in Belgrade. This is when the deal is expected to be officially announced. Jat has expressed an immediate wish to commence services to Abu Dhabi and there is even talk of Etihad code sharing on these flights, although details will be available in early February. Despite a fleet shortage Jat will provide the aircraft for the Abu Dhabi line which will now most certainly commence during the summer season. This news has left pilots and cabin crew in high spirits. Both were extremely angry once they heard that the Dubai line will be closed. The Dubai line benefited pilots due to its long flying hours while cabin crew benefited as this was the only line where they did not immediately return to Belgrade, instead they spent a few days in the ultra-modern city.
Jat resumed services to Dubai in 2002, after more than a decade. Flights were operated via Lebanon’s capital Beirut. Following the assassination of Lebanon’s president and the political instability which took place immediately afterwards Jat decided to operate Dubai via Kuwait. This proved to be a bad move. Jat was unable to secure local passengers from Kuwait to Dubai as it had extreme competition from Kuwait Airways, Emirates and low-cost Jazeera Airways. A year later Jat returned to Lebanon. However once again it was not to be. As the Israel-Lebanon war took place Jat made a decision to permanently reroute its flights to Dubai via Larnaca in Cyprus. This has been by far the most successful stop over destination to Dubai.
The new line to Abu Dhabi will also most likely be operated either via Larnaca or Beirut. More details will be available after next week’s meeting in Belgrade.
Croatia Airlines has released a short statement that it is perfectly normal for new aircraft to have technical glitches in its first year of operation. This statement is supported by Dinko Vodanović, an air crash investigator. He states that new aircraft have problems in their first year because they need time to get adjusted to the new conditions. Vodanović uses the example of Jat’s ATR72s, which were purchased in the early 90s and experienced minor technical problems once they entered service. Today they are the most reliable aircraft in Jat’s fleet.
Scandinavian Airlines SAS had particular problems with the Dash8. In 2007 a total of 3 Dash8-400s had landing gear failures. Immediately after these incidents SAS grounded all their 33 Dash-8-Q400 airliners and, a few hours later, Bombardier recommended that all Dash-8-Q400s with more than 10.000 flights be grounded until further notice. Last year Croatia Airlines had a total of 4 major emergencies – 2 with the now retired ATR42s, one with an A319 and one with the above mentioned aircraft. The Q400 costs 22 million Euros.